4 ms·

>This authority will then do everything to stall the process. They will send a bunch of questions to the person who required the documents, such as what backup

by Dah00n 3y ago

>This authority will then do everything to stall the process. They will send a bunch of questions to the person who required the documents, such as what backup software they use, where are the servers located (which is of course sensitive information), etc etc. I have made several requests and this is not at all what I have been met with. I also follow Noyb closely and this does not sound like something they meet often either (and if they do, they will sue I'm sure). >Since you are using e-mail from the United States, you will break GDPR law if you get these documents" I'd like to see proof, or I'll call that out as a lie. I have received documents at a Microsoft and Google mail. Actually, this reads very much like an American trying to describe GDPR.

carlosjobim 3y ago
Maybe you should go outside and take a breath of fresh air before you start accusing people of lying, being Americans etc? For one, these DPA decisions are confidential, or at least that's what they write when they give them. Secondly, do you think I will put my own privacy and the privacy of others in jeopardy in order to satisfy you? Even if I sent you the evidence you would refuse to acknowledge it, because you already know what you want to believe - as is your right. > I have received documents at a Microsoft and Google mail. Of course! They will not have a problem with any of that if they don't have a problem with giving out the information. It is when they don't want to give out some information that it is suddenly a problem that you use Outlook or GMail. In a majority of cases the public servants will have no issue with giving out requested information. 99% of times things work correctly and smoothly.
- Dah00n 3y ago
  > Even if I sent you the evidence I asked for a company/service name. If you can't give out that then clearly you have already said too much or you haven't got a name to give. This: >99% of times things work correctly and smoothly. and this: >The largest threat against the free press right now is the EUs GDPR laws and how they are now systematically abused by European governments Do definitly NOT agree with each other...

by Dah00n 3y ago

carlosjobim 3y ago

Maybe you should go outside and take a breath of fresh air before you start accusing people of lying, being Americans etc? For one, these DPA decisions are confidential, or at least that's what they write when they give them. Secondly, do you think I will put my own privacy and the privacy of others in jeopardy in order to satisfy you? Even if I sent you the evidence you would refuse to acknowledge it, because you already know what you want to believe - as is your right. > I have received documents at a Microsoft and Google mail. Of course! They will not have a problem with any of that if they don't have a problem with giving out the information. It is when they don't want to give out some information that it is suddenly a problem that you use Outlook or GMail. In a majority of cases the public servants will have no issue with giving out requested information. 99% of times things work correctly and smoothly.

Dah00n 3y ago
> Even if I sent you the evidence I asked for a company/service name. If you can't give out that then clearly you have already said too much or you haven't got a name to give. This: >99% of times things work correctly and smoothly. and this: >The largest threat against the free press right now is the EUs GDPR laws and how they are now systematically abused by European governments Do definitly NOT agree with each other...