3 ms·
Exactly. Whether he intended to or not, he - HIMSELF - put two different, equally authorially-dominant, sets of answers into the wild and expected students to p
by catapart 3y ago
Exactly. Whether he intended to or not, he - HIMSELF - put two different, equally authorially-dominant, sets of answers into the wild and expected students to pick the best one in what can only be described as an unauthorized (afaik?) social experiment.
Fuck the students who thought "wait, this seems like...way wrong. I feel like he said the exact opposite in class...? But, I mean, this IS the test that I'm looking at, so I guess I'm just misremembering...", is the apparent sentiment. At least he caught the obvious cheaters, right?
- anonymouskimmer 3y agoThose latter students would have been taught in high school not to trust sources without some sort of verification. Trusting that a non-verified, random upload to a cheat/study site is accurate shows lack of critical thinking skills, at best.
- theamk 3y ago> equally authorially-dominant say what? One is on the official school site, in the lectures and notes from class. Second one is an anonymous upload at the weird unofficial site which does not even have university's branding. If the students can't tell those two apart, they are in deep trouble and should not be in college.