3 ms·
HR has long since figured out how to game Glassdoor. A good metrics is # of reviews versus # of employees. You'll see some companies with such high numbers, t
by steveBK123 3y ago
HR has long since figured out how to game Glassdoor.
A good metrics is # of reviews versus # of employees.
You'll see some companies with such high numbers, that somehow 10% of current employees have left glowing reviews. Digging deeper they are mostly "less than 1 year" and terse "good company" type reviews.
- blitzar 3y ago> terse "good company" type reviews "I am in good health and have been well treated and fed since my abduction"
- analognoise 3y ago>> terse "good company" type reviews >"I am in good health and have been well treated and fed since my abduction" I make sure to watch for blinked messages, like T-O-R-T-U-R-E https://youtu.be/rufnWLVQcKg https://youtu.be/rufnWLVQcKg
- Silhouette 3y agoDigging deeper they are mostly "less than 1 year" and terse "good company" type reviews. Some of the practices described in the article are simply fraud or gagging. Where that kind of behaviour is not explicitly illegal already it probably should be. Preventing employees from giving honest and factually correct feedback about their employers is almost never in the public interest. That's not even an anti-business position because preventing fair criticism of bad employers is also against the interests of other employers who don't do those bad things.