I find a lot of the "X is unhealthy" advice to very pernicious. Because once you examine it, it typically boils down to "well, ok, healthy X is healthy, but un

I find a lot of the "X is unhealthy" advice to very pernicious. Because once you examine it, it typically boils down to "well, ok, healthy X is healthy, but unhealthy X is unhealthy", at which point it's a tautology and totally useless advice, and probably serves more to promote a bias or an agenda than anything else. But because people like platitudes, they omit the "if healthy elif unhealthy" part, and effectively lump the whole X onto one category that they feel more biased to, with a hidden 'caveat emptor' clause. It's the same here. Pursuing dreams is unhealthy -> Pursuing healthy dreams is healthy, but pursuing unhealthy dreams is unhealthy. Vegan food is healthy -> Healthy vegan food is healthy, but unhealthy vegan food is unhealthy. Exercise is healthy -> Healthy exercise is healthy, but unhealthy exercise is unhealthy. Sex is healthy -> Healthy sex is healthy, unhealthy sex in unhealthy. Liberals/Republicans are assholes -> Asshole liberals/republicans are assholes, non-asshole liberals/republicans are not assholes. I dunno, it's just getting more and more tiring to have to filter all these arguments in this manner ...