4 ms·
By that logic, you also need to accept that no one should ever need to pay you for creating artifacts that are not bound to the physical world solely. I assume
by looping__lui 3y ago
By that logic, you also need to accept that no one should ever need to pay you for creating artifacts that are not bound to the physical world solely. I assume you work for free for your employer or in a space that is not “dealing” with data, information, bits, whatsoever.
- henry2023 3y agoHairdressers charge for a service and none of them will assume that they "own" your hair.
- saurik 3y agoI am honestly shocked that this hasn't happened, what with how the world has been going in recent decades.
- looping__lui 3y agoWell, they probably can since you give them consent to keep your hair when you leave the shop… Disposing it would otherwise be considered theft, no?
- looping__lui 3y agoThey are transforming physical objects very much the same way a carpenter does. The service industry is not equal to Tech / digital. A hairdresser does not create Bits or data. I would also argue in this particular case you are wrong. You hand over the hair on the ground to them which they then dispose or maybe resell (maybe without explicit consent but at least implicit). If that wasn’t the case they would commit theft when they dispose your hair…