3 ms·
No one should have "rights" to any data, information, bits, or whatever. It's not physical and any attempt to apply artificial scarcity to replicate the physica
by colordrops 3y ago
No one should have "rights" to any data, information, bits, or whatever. It's not physical and any attempt to apply artificial scarcity to replicate the physical world is a crime against humanity. The lines around which data is protected and which is copyable is arbitrary bullshit. You aren't stealing a fire when you light one candle with another. It's my storage device and I'm not breaking the law all of a sudden because the gates are holding a different set of charges.
- looping__lui 3y agoBy that logic, you also need to accept that no one should ever need to pay you for creating artifacts that are not bound to the physical world solely. I assume you work for free for your employer or in a space that is not “dealing” with data, information, bits, whatsoever.
- henry2023 3y agoHairdressers charge for a service and none of them will assume that they "own" your hair.
- saurik 3y agoI am honestly shocked that this hasn't happened, what with how the world has been going in recent decades.
- looping__lui 3y agoWell, they probably can since you give them consent to keep your hair when you leave the shop… Disposing it would otherwise be considered theft, no?
- looping__lui 3y agoThey are transforming physical objects very much the same way a carpenter does. The service industry is not equal to Tech / digital. A hairdresser does not create Bits or data. I would also argue in this particular case you are wrong. You hand over the hair on the ground to them which they then dispose or maybe resell (maybe without explicit consent but at least implicit). If that wasn’t the case they would commit theft when they dispose your hair…