3 ms·
It's obvious though. Should they also note who it is that knows it to be the oldest, along with when and where they knew this? Just in case? Did you get burned
by Tao3300 3y ago
It's obvious though. Should they also note who it is that knows it to be the oldest, along with when and where they knew this? Just in case?
Did you get burned on an exam over this or something? It's silly to be so exact about this.
- ekianjo 3y ago> It's silly to be so exact about this. It's silly for scientists to be always surprised by finding some older stuff over and over again as they scratch more of the earth. Statistically speaking, there is no reason that the oldest stuff would be found first, yet you keep seeing headlines "this is older than what we thought" making them look like complete naive people every single time.