3 ms·
This is why I use SMPlayer. It has all the features of VLC and is less resource-intensive, to boot. Edit: also displays subtitles a lot better.
by w1ntermute 15y ago
This is why I use SMPlayer. It has all the features of VLC and is less resource-intensive, to boot.
Edit: also displays subtitles a lot better.
- conradfr 15y agoI use kmplayer for the same reasons. I have yet to test VLC 2.0 though.
- jbk 15y agoDisplay subtitles better? You did not test 2.0.0. This is exactly what was fixed in this version. You might need to use the OpenGL output on Linux, though.
- w1ntermute 15y agoJust updated to 2.0.0 on Arch x64, and things subtitle-wise are not much better. They still look much less grainy on SMPlayer, though I may be able to mitigate that at least partially by fiddling with the settings (though ideally this wouldn't be necessary). But trying VLC out reminded me of a few more issues: * Activating the controls while in full-screen mode (by hitting the bottom of the screen) is temperamental * There's a lag after unpausing the video before audio starts playing again. Not functionally relevant, but it drives me nuts.
- jbk 15y agoDid you try the OpenGL output?
- simcop2387 15y agoVLC can use libass also for subtitles. I don't believe this is the default way it's shipped in most linux distros however. Once it's added in and the plugin is enabled however It does do it just as well as mplayer. This is one of the reasons that I like gentoo on my desktop. It makes getting some of these things nearly trivial once setup.
- jbk 15y agoYes, I saw that on a few distributions. I do not know why this is the case. Maybe we should add a bigger warning during configure.