9 ms·
It's not just the software. They are trying to make due without the kind of sensors that are required to properly sense the immediate environment (LIDAR)
by metalliqaz 3y ago
It's not just the software. They are trying to make due without the kind of sensors that are required to properly sense the immediate environment (LIDAR)
- throwaway894345 3y agoThis may surprise, but LIDAR is a very recent innovation and virtually zero percent of cars (particularly historically) are LIDAR equipped. Binocular vision has a pretty impressive track record.
- fragmede 3y agoNot with electrical brains, unfortunately.
- sushid 3y agoBinocular vision as in human vision? Powered by the human brain? That's vastly different than binocular vision powered by Tesla's rudimentary "AI"
- wavefunction 3y agoThey decided to forgo LIDAR specifically though, it's not that it hasn't been out very long and they haven't adopted it yet. Other car makers have been using it for a while, just as long as Tesla could have if they truly want to be cutting edge.
- jonathankoren 3y agoIt might also come as a surprise that the the lack of a LiDAR, and famously disabling the radar directly relates to Tesla’s poor self driving performance compared to the actual leaders in the area like Waymo and Cruise.
- blendo 3y agoI didn’t think Tesla used binocular (stereoscope) cameras. These comments seem to confirm: https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/threads/does-tesla-have-binocular-vision.283371/ https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/threads/does-tesla-have-bino...
- ClumsyPilot 3y agoHuman eye has the dynamic range of 24 F-stops, and best cameras have like 14. That's a difference of several million. Also humans have hearing, and really advanced CPU. Tesla can't tell apart a deadly bollard from a large plastic bag flying in the wind.
- asdff 3y agoHow expensive is LIDAR even? My xiaomi vacuum has LIDAR.
- sidibe 3y agoThey were considerably more expensive the first year Tesla FSD was due to be ready by the end of the year. After that I guess it was deemed easier to do magic with some low quality cameras than get certain people to admit they're wrong and change course.
- throwbadubadu 3y agoCurrent ones still 10-20k, some advances and mass production will lower that further. And there are very different LIDARs (frequency, resolution, range!!), the ones in Smartphones and other small devices work very different.. maybe as different as the ultrasonic sensors in your car vs medical ultrasonic (beware, bad comparison actually).
- mensetmanusman 3y agoCan your vacuum see 300 meters away and plan how to clean the east wing of your estate?
- somehnguy 3y agoMine most likely can’t see 300 meters, but it definitely knows where it is and plans it route, optimizing over time. It’s kinda neat to pick it up in the middle of vacuuming, move it to a different room, then set it back down and watch it go back to where it left off.
- asdff 3y agoI live in an apartment so I've yet to really see the reach of this thing's lidar. It maps the room almost immediately though, then cleans by first lapping the perimeter of an area then does laps to cover the inside of the perimeter like someone mowing grass. The map is cached from the last full cleaning, so if I wanted it to do some spot cleaning I can define an arbitrary rectangle and specify how many passes I want over that spot (one is always enough, the second pass never picks up anything else). I can also control it manually but the controls have some latency from the app. I love this thing, it fills its chamber entirely with cat hair that I wouldn't even see until sending it out. It also tracks maintenance and tells me when sensors or the filter needs cleaning, or if parts like brushes need replacing (haven't needed one yet).