3 ms·
>The vast majority of even backup data is legally required to either be readable in a very short amount of time (say one week) or is required to be deleted with
by RobotToaster 3y ago
>The vast majority of even backup data is legally required to either be readable in a very short amount of time (say one week) or is required to be deleted within 90 days. Neither of these are ideal for optical
Wouldn't an autoloader solve the the former, and a fire solve the latter?
- codemac 3y agoYou are assuming the data is compacted such that the 90day data is grouped by expiration date. This is not how production deletion works at any reasonable scale where cost of media matters. In reality, the data is all mixed up because data gets backed up usually around the time it's written, and gets deleted in a completely different pattern. The art of compaction is very important, and things like optical and tape make inaccurate compaction extremely expensive due to the reduced IO. And even if we pretend you do have perfect compaction, you still don't have nearly the IO that HDD would provide. Considering hypothetically you have perfect compaction, that also means you have the perfectly smallest live data set, and thus the HDD premium is even smaller for wildly better throughput in disaster.