3 ms·

They also saved millions of lives.

• ipaddr 3y ago
  [flagged]
• pastacacioepepe 3y ago
  And caused many unnecessary deaths by witholding the vaccine from less rich countries that couldn't outcompete richer ones, since the supply was very limited in the moments of most need. If they really wanted to save lives they should have liberalized the vaccine's production, but all they cared for was profit, the life saving just a coincidence.
  • glogla 3y ago
    Eh, it's not like you people would share SinoVac, even if it worked properly.
    • pastacacioepepe 3y ago
      > it's not like you people would share SinoVac Patently false[0]. Then yes, Chinese vaccines might have been less effective but it was still an obvious choice when the alternative was nothing. By the way, what do you mean by "you people"?? I'm European and your statement makes me think you have a fragile ego and a typical USamerican superiority complex. .0: https://archive.is/Ir6qt https://archive.is/Ir6qt
      • glogla 3y ago
        Your other comments mention living in China, and you also deny Uighur genocide, so thinking you're pro-CCP is not exactly a stretch, is it? CCP could buy Western vaccines, but they instead chose their own, even when they knew it is less effective, because their people's lives were less important to them than their ego.
        • pastacacioepepe 3y ago
          [flagged]
        • pastacacioepepe 3y ago
          [flagged]
        • pastacacioepepe 3y ago
          > you also deny Uighur genocide It's *Uyghur. At least learn their name if you pretend to know everything about their alleged genocide. Do some unbiased research and you will come to the same conclusion. > thinking you're pro-CCP is not exactly a stretch It's CPC but yes. > CCP could buy Western vaccines Sure, the supply wasn't enough for Europe alone and you think China could have vaccinated 1 billion quickly using western vaccines?