4 ms·
> That's a pretty serious step with the federal government directly limiting what every business can do. I'm not actually sure if that would even be constitutio
by polski-g 3y ago
> That's a pretty serious step with the federal government directly limiting what every business can do. I'm not actually sure if that would even be constitutional given that it severely limits how potentially privately owned businesses set their own terms of use.
See: https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/civil-rights-act https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/civil-rights-ac...
- flagrant_taco 3y agoI never said there isn't precedent for the government seeing some limits on what companies can do. It's important to note, though, that this is a constitutional amendment rather than a law and had a much higher requirement to pass. This precedent would also be equating the civil rights protections within American borders with the rights of non-US citizens to use a company's payment service in a foreign territory. Not sure that is be comfortable comparing those two issues.