3 ms·
I'll repost my response to this from the last time it got brought up. I talk favorably about Elm all the time so I hope this doesn't come off as defensive but I
by savanaly 3y ago
I'll repost my response to this from the last time it got brought up. I talk favorably about Elm all the time so I hope this doesn't come off as defensive but I really think Evan was more tone deaf than rude in this case.
"""
I feel like this exchange is this skit writ small...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sngRrkQayDA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sngRrkQayDA. Evan meant a congenial "why are you doing this" as in like..honestly why do they match negative literals? Everyone took it as an accusatory statement that implied "you moron, why would you do such a thing?" which I at first took it that way too so I can totally understand! But on reflection I think he wouldn't react that way and I believe he was just misinterpreted. And by fake examples he meant contrived examples. He wasn't accusing them of acting in bad faith I don't think.
"""
- eweise 3y agoIt doesn't really matter why someone wants to match a negative literal. Its unexpected behavior and should either be documented as part of the language design, or fixed because its a bug.
- barefootford 3y agoMaybe. Probably! But he never followed up to clarify or respond to real use cases.