3 ms·
Looking at the authors, was this created by experts in AI? Is it sufficient to truly be a `canon`?
by dpflan 3y ago
Looking at the authors, was this created by experts in AI? Is it sufficient to truly be a `canon`?
- whimsicalism 3y agoDoesn't seem like it to me and it skews very non-technical, but I can vouch for some of the sources they link - Sasha Rush's Annotated Transformer is great If I were to give a critique, it seems too skewed towards things business/product people would find interesting that aren't actually all that impactful (Tesla's self-driving, for instance) and also seems skewed to things I see in certain SF twitter bubbles. Directly linking lesswrong posts also seems a bit... cringe-y for a VC.