> I wouldn't call WinUI 3 a success. Fair, I would say it's somewhat actively developed, for now... Which is maybe a step above UWP XAML. Microsoft promised t

> I wouldn't call WinUI 3 a success. Fair, I would say it's somewhat actively developed, for now... Which is maybe a step above UWP XAML. Microsoft promised to open source WinUI 3 years ago, but it keeps getting pushed back in favour of other priorities. This isn't good for a healthy community, who can only report bugs, and never fix them.