3 ms·
On the other hand, at $DAYJOB, being able to say that Deno has access to everything node can do goes a long way. Not having to reinvent the wheels is definitely
by lytedev 3y ago
On the other hand, at $DAYJOB, being able to say that Deno has access to everything node can do goes a long way. Not having to reinvent the wheels is definitely nice!
- toastercat 3y agoTrue but I think trying to make a tool useful to everyone's $DAYJOB is kind of overrated. Instead of trying to make the tool the best it can be on its own merits, you're trying to please the millions of folks who already bought into another ecosystem.
- electroly 3y agoThis is tough/impossible when you're VC-funded like Deno is. Once they took VC funding, they didn't have a choice but to shoot for the moon. Deno without NPM support wasn't seeing the uptake they wanted.
- toastercat 3y agoYep, agree. I think things went a little wayward when they took the VC funding.
- pxc 3y agoDepends on your role and organizational goals. If you work in application security, it makes Deno harder to recommend, because then the recommendation (or perhaps even mandate) has to come with extra instrumentation in order to enforce the additional security the runtime is supposed to bring. It also makes you question the priorities of the project, given that this is still early days. If the supposed focus on security is already being compromised on and whittled away today, would a recommendation to build with Deno even prove meaningful in 5 or 10 years?