5 ms·

I love the religious overtones of this, especially as I was brought up devout Christian and have a good familiarity with the Old Testament prophets and the Book

I love the religious overtones of this, especially as I was brought up devout Christian and have a good familiarity with the Old Testament prophets and the Book of Revelation. Here, the author is warning us of the promised false prophets and deceivers, who do the work of the Enemy in its long and shadowy struggle with The Science. Only those who follow the True Path will enlighten humanity, navigate our pending Doom, and guide us into the prosperous Green Age.

SQueeeeeL 3y ago
I have no idea what argument this comment is trying to make. All the comments in this thread seem to be pretty wild, so this is probably another one of those "Hacker News becomes unhinged when you bring up topic X" situations.
- joenot443 3y ago
  I don't think they're trying to make an argument, just broadly observing that the article has some similarities to some Biblical themes. I didn't see it as unhinged or wild, just a very tame observation. I'm curious what part of their comment bothered you so much?
  - giraffe_lady 3y ago
    It's probably the unstated implication that because the argument may share some similarities to religious principals it can be straightforwardly dismissed as having no value. This assumes that both religion has no value, and that things resembling religion, possibly in any way, have no value. This is unrigorous, because a lot of things resemble religion generally or specific religious practice in various ways and have value despite or sometimes because of that resemblance. And annoying also because a lot of people find value in their religious beliefs and it's petty to dismiss that common experience.
    - faffffaf 3y ago
      >have value despite or sometimes because of that resemblance What kinds of value? Personal reflection and growth? Community cohesiveness? The construction of inspirational and grandiose places of worship? How would these be useful values to the cause of Climate Change? >It's probably the unstated implication that because the argument may share some similarities to religious principals it can be straightforwardly dismissed as having no value. Nearly. It's that the root causes and values of such societal constructs and shared value sets might be quite different than we expect at face value.
      - giraffe_lady 3y ago
        Yes, these are great examples of the sort of good & useful conversations that are not going to happen when you frame all religious impulses as inherently valueless or destructive.
        faffffaf 3y ago
        Religious impulses get measured on a different metric than the dry, purely scientific and logical basis that Climate Change is supposedly formed from. If it really is a religious impulse, then we have to completely re-evaluate the constructiveness and worth of the idea (that is, if its acolytes will let us).
hotpotamus 3y ago
How devout is your christianity currently?
- faffffaf 3y ago
  Negative.
mistermann 3y ago
The author is also guilty of the very same crime she accuses others of in claiming that what we should be focusing on necessarily is big oil. That even philosophy professors can make these mistakes shows how tricky it is.

SQueeeeeL 3y ago

I have no idea what argument this comment is trying to make. All the comments in this thread seem to be pretty wild, so this is probably another one of those "Hacker News becomes unhinged when you bring up topic X" situations.

joenot443 3y ago
I don't think they're trying to make an argument, just broadly observing that the article has some similarities to some Biblical themes. I didn't see it as unhinged or wild, just a very tame observation. I'm curious what part of their comment bothered you so much?
- giraffe_lady 3y ago
  It's probably the unstated implication that because the argument may share some similarities to religious principals it can be straightforwardly dismissed as having no value. This assumes that both religion has no value, and that things resembling religion, possibly in any way, have no value. This is unrigorous, because a lot of things resemble religion generally or specific religious practice in various ways and have value despite or sometimes because of that resemblance. And annoying also because a lot of people find value in their religious beliefs and it's petty to dismiss that common experience.
  - faffffaf 3y ago
    >have value despite or sometimes because of that resemblance What kinds of value? Personal reflection and growth? Community cohesiveness? The construction of inspirational and grandiose places of worship? How would these be useful values to the cause of Climate Change? >It's probably the unstated implication that because the argument may share some similarities to religious principals it can be straightforwardly dismissed as having no value. Nearly. It's that the root causes and values of such societal constructs and shared value sets might be quite different than we expect at face value.
    - giraffe_lady 3y ago
      Yes, these are great examples of the sort of good & useful conversations that are not going to happen when you frame all religious impulses as inherently valueless or destructive.
      - faffffaf 3y ago
        Religious impulses get measured on a different metric than the dry, purely scientific and logical basis that Climate Change is supposedly formed from. If it really is a religious impulse, then we have to completely re-evaluate the constructiveness and worth of the idea (that is, if its acolytes will let us).

hotpotamus 3y ago

How devout is your christianity currently?

faffffaf 3y ago
Negative.

mistermann 3y ago

The author is also guilty of the very same crime she accuses others of in claiming that what we should be focusing on necessarily is big oil. That even philosophy professors can make these mistakes shows how tricky it is.