3 ms·
Ok; two things: 1. For "objects" and "artwork" it says that quality is above 100% (108% and 119% respectively), which is weird and doesn't inspire confidence?
by bambax 3y ago
Ok; two things:
1. For "objects" and "artwork" it says that quality is above 100% (108% and 119% respectively), which is weird and doesn't inspire confidence? It's also unclear generally what those percentages mean.
2. When trying this from work it says "Unable to connect to the worker. Is your firewall or proxy blocking WebSockets?" -- it's possible that the firewall is the culprit but there should be a workaround? (All methods give the same result, drag'n drop, ctrl+v, or picking from the explorer).
- wes-k 3y agoYou can click through to see the report. Above 100% means they performed better than the competition, not they handled every picture well. > Pixian.AI had 241 images that were rated good, or not rated and identical. That's 87.0% of your 277 images. > The competitor had 201 images that were rated good, or not rated and identical. That's 72.6% of your 277 images. > Pixian.AI achieved 241 / 201 = 119.9% of the competitor's performance > The report is based on a set of user-provided images. We then reviewed the services' respective results separately and rated them as either good or bad. The comparison was done in a blind manner, without labels indicating which result was Pixian.AI's and which was the competitor's. We then tallied up the results and produced this report. https://pixian.ai/comparisons/cwsslt8d78zl7vq/share/5e51cd3d06fd714cdf98ace251cb0bb76ad38dbe62fa1515dca5ede4d3aefa13 https://pixian.ai/comparisons/cwsslt8d78zl7vq/share/5e51cd3d...
- mmastrac 3y agoIt's not a great way to compare, but a clearer presentation would state "100%" for pixian.ai and < 100% for the competitor.