3 ms·
That's what I mean: it's not in the same city, it's in another one. For historical reasons of course, and it's not necessarily a bad thing, but it has to be tak
by rakoo 3y ago
That's what I mean: it's not in the same city, it's in another one. For historical reasons of course, and it's not necessarily a bad thing, but it has to be taken into account: 30km can take a long time with public transportation, and the very existence of a special shuttle in many places is an additional proof, especially when said shuttle isn't exactly cheap.
There are exceptions, and that is good, but it's that: exceptions.
- BrandoElFollito 3y agoNo, they are not exceptions. This is a mix, I have no idea about the percentage but the few ones I checked are in both camps - MUC: outside of the city - KRK: outside of the city - LHR: OK, right at the border of Greater London - OHR: added specifically to Chicago, it was outside before - BVA: outside the city - LTN: outside the city - FRA: inside the city (it is an extension)
- rakoo 3y agoWhat matters is not whether they are inside or outside the city, it's that they are always far away from the center (where people actually want to go) so taking the actual location of the airport isn't a proper way to represent the real travel