4 ms·
They are, but my impression is that only Emacs users use them to some extent. (Emacs has a built-in info reader that is better than the standalone client, and s
by drbaba 3y ago
They are, but my impression is that only Emacs users use them to some extent. (Emacs has a built-in info reader that is better than the standalone client, and ships mainly info pages as its documentation.) Outside of Emacs, I’d say very few people know info is even a thing, and I remember some Linux distributions also stripped info pages from packages since everyone used man pages.
- anthk 3y agoMore than better, people doesn't know how to use GNU Info correctly.
- JdeBP 3y agoIn fairness, if one were to come to more, pg, or less with no prior knowledge of the conventions, the madness of some of the character choices would be just as grating. Ironically, this sort of stuff -- the basic conventions like qhjkl0^$G + CRFFBSSPC keyboard navigation and :/? prompt modes -- is exactly what one initially learns from guides, tutorials, other people in IRC, and whatnot, long before coming to reference doco. The _Introduction to Linux_ book at TLDP covers the bare essentials of these conventions, q, b, and SPC, in the "quickstart" chapter 2. * https://tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/sect_02_03.html https://tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/sect_02_03.html
- krylon 3y agoEvery time I could not find and answer to a question in a man page and consulted info, it was a waste of time. I like info, really, but the remark at the end of most GNU man pages to look at the info pages is misleading at best. For emacs stuff, yes, it's very convenient. I remember once upon a time, Python docs were available in info as well. When you have good documentation available in info, it's very nice.