4 ms·
The author's claim is "this isn't just statistics; the model is reasoning". But just because something goes beyond "just statistics" doesn't mean it's reasoning
by jxf 3y ago
The author's claim is "this isn't just statistics; the model is reasoning". But just because something goes beyond "just statistics" doesn't mean it's reasoning.
- chaxor 3y agoPerhaps, but taken with other works in the area, a better picture does emerge regarding this claim. Substantial works already showing reasoning capabilities in GPT-4, which show that these models do reason very well - near human performance for many causal reasoning tasks. (1) Additionally, there is a mathematical proof that these systems align with dynamic programming, and therefore can perform algorithmic reasoning. (2,3) 1) https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00050.pdf https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00050.pdf 2) https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.13211.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.13211.pdf 3) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.15544.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.15544.pdf
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]