4 ms·
> It isn't a prohibition against the impacted party speaking out, just a delay. It’s exactly this “it’s totally fair, surely it’s not ridiculous” attitude that
by yunohn 3y ago
> It isn't a prohibition against the impacted party speaking out, just a delay.
It’s exactly this “it’s totally fair, surely it’s not ridiculous” attitude that shows how the powers control the people.
Gag orders and secrecy agreements can definitely be indefinite and regularly are.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220809113138/https://cdt.org/insights/congress-needs-to-make-surveillance-gag-orders-fair-and-rare/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220809113138/https://cdt.org/i...
- rootusrootus 3y agoAssuming it's always ridiculous doesn't seem like a position any more enlightened.
- JasonFruit 3y agoPossibly safer for people's rights, though.