3 ms·
I’m actually not sure the Al Jazeera writer has the sources, as this piece is done by interviewing the scientists. The journalist simply asked the scientists an
by runarberg 3y ago
I’m actually not sure the Al Jazeera writer has the sources, as this piece is done by interviewing the scientists. The journalist simply asked the scientists and reported on what they said. Surely the journalist could ask the scientists for sources, and maybe they should have, and maybe they did but the scientist didn’t have them at hand at that exact moment.
But if you are interested, here is the tweet in question: https://twitter.com/KHayhoe/status/1640915926152298497 https://twitter.com/KHayhoe/status/1640915926152298497
In journalism it is often more important to find sources which back each other up, rather then finding original research. In this case the journalist interviews a few scientists that all tell a similar story. I think the journalist here is simply doing what they have been trained to do.
- _aavaa_ 3y agoThe link you provide unfortunately cannot be the source. The article discusses an A/B test on an identical tweet that they put out. The tweet is talking about follower changes (research that was done by Ketan Joshi "and a few other climate folks", which based on Katharine's wording of the tweet it doesn't look like she had a part in).