3 ms·
> But there needs to be a better link than this website. It is far too politically charged and biased. Agreed... but when nobody else will publish what's the a
by mikece 3y ago
> But there needs to be a better link than this website. It is far too politically charged and biased.
Agreed... but when nobody else will publish what's the alternative?
- chomp 3y agoThere's so many articles on the internet from more reputable sources than this site, implying that no one else is publishing the news is wrong. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/newly-public-fisc-opinion-best-evidence-why-congress-must-end-section-702 https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/newly-public-fisc-opin... https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/19/us/politics/fbi-violated-surveillance-program-rules.html https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/19/us/politics/fbi-violated-... https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/05/19/fbi-digital-surveillance-misuse-jan6-blm/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/05/19/... https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/05/fbi-misused-foreign-surveillance-law-280k-times-to-snoop-on-people-in-the-us/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/05/fbi-misused-fore...
- godelski 3y agoYeah I'd suggest the EFF one, as it is probably the least politically contentious and most aligned with HN (being highly computer oriented). Maybe Dang can change the link and/or mike can resubmit.