5 ms·
Layoffs do cause damage to people's lives, but so does not having a job in the first place. The question is whether it would have been better to never have had
by hn_throwaway_99 3y ago
Layoffs do cause damage to people's lives, but so does not having a job in the first place. The question is whether it would have been better to never have had these additional pandemic jobs at all.
To be clear, I'm not saying there is a single correct answer. Layoffs really do cause damage, and in many cases people left more stable jobs. Still, though, so often I see on HN and elsewhere that layoffs are just the worst thing imaginable and an indication that "management has failed", and I don't agree with that at all. If people are treated with respect (and I'm not really talking about any messaging, I'm talking about if they receive a decent severance), I don't really see a problem. E.g. if someone is hired, say works for a solid 2 years, but then is laid off with say 6 months of severance, I think that person was treated fairly. But I'd probably have a very different answer if someone was hired on for 3 months, made significant changes in their family situation to accommodate that job, and then the company realized they f'd up and panicked, and that person was laid off with 2 weeks severance.
- JamesBarney 3y agoI agree with you, but is anyone getting 6 months severance from 2 years of work?
- happymellon 3y agoCompletely agree, wasn't it Meta that hired a guy from India, who sold everything there and moved to the US only to be laid off a couple of days before starting? Now that destroys lives and is a dick move. There is no indication that any of the people that Lenovo hired are part of the layoff. Elsewhere I read that Lenovo have been doing all of the hiring in the R&D dept which was not included in the layoffs.