3 ms·
I primarily ride a bike and have been low-car since college in the early 2000's... hell, I've been a mod on /r/bicycling since around 2010. I took some Earth Sc
by scoofy 3y ago
I primarily ride a bike and have been low-car since college in the early 2000's... hell, I've been a mod on /r/bicycling since around 2010. I took some Earth Sciences back when the professors just assumed people would act rationally and care about their climate impact. That seems adorably naive in retrospect. I think one of the biggest issues... as is always... is the housing shortage.
I'm currently trying to find new housing that is low-car friendly (my lifestyle), and also dog-friendly (my gf's lifestyle). Yes, we live in the bay area, but this applies to every single major tech hub in America. If we want to get a two bedroom unit, that's both safely bikeable to central SF, but also a few blocks from a dog park, we're going to probably need to pay about $4000 per month. That's about $50,000 per year; it's about 40% of the SF median household income.
As much as I hate the way our sprawl is infecting climate change... the real reason sprawl has taken over is that we've blocked urban housing construction for 70 years.
I hardly blame younger folks for their exurban lifestyles at this point. I can barely afford being an urbanist, over 40, without having roommates... and I consider myself fairly well off. And I'm counting down the days until I say 'fuck it' and just move to Milwaukee or Pittsburgh where I could basically retire (not at all a slight, just the extremely rare affordable urbanist cities). I can't imagine what it would be like with kids.
If you pretend to care about the environment, you need to be at your city council meetings demanding high-density, mixed-use, housing in your neighborhood.
- CalRobert 3y agoHear hear! Another option is to move somewhere better. Happy to discuss emigration.
- scoofy 3y agoI would very much consider immigration to western Ireland, Scotland, or the Netherlands if I hadn't built a life for myself in Northern California. As of now, the only reasonably affordable (not actually affordable) areas to live in with a temperate climates are in parts of Sonoma and Humbolt Counties, and Salinas. Any serious move would take some convincing, especially with a partner who is from the area. As someone who prefers the cool fog to warm sun, there aren't a lot of friendly climate zones friendly that don't involve the pacific northwest, but that's a tough sell to normal folks that think grey skies are unpleasant. As someone pretty much fatalistic about stopping climate change, I think the fortunes may favor the pacific northwest over Northern Europe in the next 50 years. It's an awkward gamble to make, but it's one that takes a lot more than just weather into account.
- CalRobert 3y agoIn the Irish midlands now (came from California) but working on a move to NL.
- scruple 3y agoJust curious, because I daydream about doing these sorts of things and consider the same places. Do you have a family with you?
- CalRobert 3y agoEmail is in my bio if you want to chat. I do, but when moving here it was just my wife (then gf) and I on working holiday visas. Ireland is wonderful in many respects but also a deeply frustrating place, it's extremely car-dependent outside the middle of Dublin and perhaps what's harder is that most people see that as fine. Climate breakdown is viewed as a far away problem for other people, and rural communities can be insular. I have heard that some areas in Clare and West Cork are transforming, though. That being said, I live in a beautiful house on 3.5 acres a 15 minute bike ride from the train station and we want to move to the Netherlands so our kids can have actual freedom before learning to drive. Also a lot more jobs on climatebase.org are in NL (and DE), they're never in Ireland.