This was the point: > Why is it justifiable to violate the property rights of the company owners to exert influence on jobs that the company also owns? Health

This was the point: > Why is it justifiable to violate the property rights of the company owners to exert influence on jobs that the company also owns? Health/safety regulations and inspections are examples of things that often “violate the property rights of the company owners to exert influence on jobs that the company also owns”. The original point did not mention any exceptions whatsoever relating to “life and limb”. Now it seems like you’ve clarified that you do not think property rights are absolute, but the original post did not make that obvious.