5 ms·
I simply asked it to make it unit testable and it did the task 100 percent. I'm not sure where your side track is coming from. Who in their right mind would ev
by byby 3y ago
I simply asked it to make it unit testable and it did the task 100 percent.
I'm not sure where your side track is coming from. Who in their right mind would ever check in code that prints a range of numbers from 0 to x?
The example wasn't about writing good code or realistic code. It's about an LLM knowing and understanding what I asked it to do. It did this by literally creating a correct answer that doesn't exist. Sorry it doesn't satisfy your code quality standards but that's not part of the task is it? Why don't you ask it to make the code quality better? It can likely do it Maybe that will stop the subtle insults (please don't subtly imply I'm incompetent that's fucking rude)
Like why even get into code quality about some toy example? What's the objective? To fulfill some agenda against AI? I think that's literally a lot of what's going on in this thread.
- blibble 3y ago> Like why even get into code quality about some toy example? What's the objective? it was your example plus: toy examples are all it really does
- byby 3y agoYeah. Why did you get pedantic, rude and heated about the code quality for my toy example? It's my example sure, but it's your reaction to it that makes no sense. plus: that's not true.