3 ms·
Exactly, same with intelligence - it's polluted with emotions and all kind of "nonsense" - but it doesn't have to. We can create emotionless, super-intelligent
by mirekrusin 3y ago
Exactly, same with intelligence - it's polluted with emotions and all kind of "nonsense" - but it doesn't have to. We can create emotionless, super-intelligent machines exceeding human capability by far (and use them as hammers). No need to imitate every detail of the brain to extract intelligence.
- pixl97 3y agoThe counter to this is you can end up with an exceptionally powerful, but unaligned AI, which presents a new series of 'known unknowns' and 'unknown unknowns' that we have to deal with.
- mirekrusin 3y agoYes, possibly. Simple example would be an army robot that is extermely efficient human killer that upps-escaped. Original argument was around optimising on intelligence and that biology doesn't hold best-possible trophy on it. We don't need to match number of neural connections in human brain to exceed its intelligence.
- TeMPOraL 3y ago> We don't need to match number of neural connections in human brain to exceed its intelligence. That's also true because of wheels/road thing, in that we can "cheat" here too. More specifically, some of the neural connections in the human brain are dedicated to sensing, processing and controlling the dynamic state of human body. Purely-software AIs don't need those for intelligence.