3 ms·
The first part of your response is just equivocation. The latter is just an assertion lacking substantial evidence.
by bilvar 3y ago
The first part of your response is just equivocation. The latter is just an assertion lacking substantial evidence.
- machinawhite 3y agoYou're delusional.
- Eisenstein 3y agoI don't know how I can provide evidence without access to JSTOR. I don't feel like spending $30/paper to come up with statistics and studies for you.
- tombert 3y agoI have access to JSTOR; which paper you want?
- Eisenstein 3y ago* https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly/article/abs/does-loyalty-in-the-workplace-have-a-future/435FF32B495BC4DA7D1AB4412A449E55#article https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quar... * https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-6486.00218 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-6486.0... Thanks.
- tombert 3y agoThey're downloaded. I don't know how to send them to you. My email is in my HN profile if you want to contact me.
- Eisenstein 3y ago.
- tombert 3y agoDone.
- bilvar 3y agoYes because we all know self-reported data from employees on how loyal they are and how bad corporations are is a reliable method to come up with studies that are worth the paper they're written on. Get a grip.
- Eisenstein 3y agoAre you preemptively dismissing data you haven't seen? Talk about a closed mind and an argument in bad faith.