> WFH is nothing but a cost savings for companies. WFH is a loss of control. For some leaders, being a "boss" is more important than what's good for the busine

> WFH is nothing but a cost savings for companies. WFH is a loss of control. For some leaders, being a "boss" is more important than what's good for the business. WFH also requires the right culture. I've seen it abused when I worked at Intel, and when Yahoo cracked down on it, the abuses were similar. I should point out that I've predominately WFH for almost a decade; but it works because I'm trustworthy and I work for people who are managers instead of "bosses." In an environment where the workers aren't trustworthy, or the management structure is more about being a "boss," it won't work.