3 ms·
My inquiry is about concrete, measurable tasks for which the question of "superiority" makes sense to ask. I'm not familiar with the works you are referencing,
by p-e-w 3y ago
My inquiry is about concrete, measurable tasks for which the question of "superiority" makes sense to ask. I'm not familiar with the works you are referencing, but your response gives the strong impression that I would find metaphysical arguments or unjustified assumptions about the human mind, which I've seen many times and am not interested in.
If possible, please name a single concrete task that, according to those articles, the average human today can demonstrably beat a computer at.
- cratermoon 3y agoDreaming.
- p-e-w 3y agoDreaming is not a "task", and certainly not one where performance comparisons make any sense.
- cratermoon 3y agoI sense that discussion is headed towards "it doesn't count if a computer can't do it", in which case, the premises begs the question. Good day, sir.
- p-e-w 3y agoTake two humans. What does it mean for one of them to be "better at dreaming" than the other?
- cratermoon 3y ago> creative writing, poetry, drawing Show me a concrete, quantitative measure to evaluate the quality of those activities or their outcomes. Use that to demonstrate that LLMs are better than the average human. But first, define "average" for a poet, writer, or artist.