4 ms·
It would probably cost a lot more to evict Twitter and find a new commercial tenant than it does to compel them to pay rent. The reason this wouldn’t apply to
by LapsangGuzzler 3y ago
It would probably cost a lot more to evict Twitter and find a new commercial tenant than it does to compel them to pay rent.
The reason this wouldn’t apply to you is that residential real estate vacancies are usually easy to fill, especially nowadays.
- thaumasiotes 3y ago> The reason this wouldn’t apply to you That remains to be established. People often have no idea what renter protections are like. If he's in California, he might find that he can't be evicted without the landlord going through a multi-year process.
- seattle_spring 3y agoTake years, or even a year, is very much hyperbole, even for SF. Particularly when dealing with non-paying tenants. This may have been different during eviction moratoriums at the height of the pandemic.
- sjburt 3y agoThe eviction moratorium is still active in SF, Oakland and Berkeley.