The rest of the article doesn’t make this argument at all, and even the paragraph you wrote is IMO merely weirdly written. It says “ the earliest evidence of h

The rest of the article doesn’t make this argument at all, and even the paragraph you wrote is IMO merely weirdly written. It says “ the earliest evidence of human lip kissing originated in a very specific geographical location”, which is precisely what they mean. It’s absurd because of course the earliest anything found at an archaeological site came from a very specific geographical location.