4 ms·
1. Yes, very. Loading indicator could be a little more clearer on time estimate, but great/outstanding overall. 2. No, it seems too direct and not creative. I
by james-revisoai 3y ago
1. Yes, very. Loading indicator could be a little more clearer on time estimate, but great/outstanding overall.
2. No, it seems too direct and not creative. I wonder if the original non-instruct models (curie etc) would be better for this use case than ChatGPT. Because they make more divergent and creative results.
- hennekec 3y ago1. Cool, thanks! And great suggestion with the loading indicator. Makes sense, especially since it does take awhile for all the ChatGPT/GoDaddy processing to happen. 2. Thanks, that's good feedback to hear. I hadn't thought about trying the different models. Currently it's using gpt-3.5-turbo with the temperature set to 1.3. While testing, when I bumped the temperature up higher I started getting a lot more non-sensical words / letter combinations. I do have a lot of extra guidance added to the user's prompt before it gets submitted to the API (including to be creative), but it sounds like it's still not quite there. I'll do some more experimenting with prompt pre-processing, and try out some of the other models too!