3 ms·
> How do you imagine a penalty exists without legal action? Google is already forced to judge the case. If someone fills enough bogus cases (bogus in Googles o
by 6510 3y ago
> How do you imagine a penalty exists without legal action?
Google is already forced to judge the case. If someone fills enough bogus cases (bogus in Googles opinion) or a ridiculous one they (google) can stop processing them.
Say I fill a complaint against a restaurant about food poisoning - but I didn't eat there. People might waste their time investigating it but surely it wont happen when I complaint for a second time?
But I do think deleting all web browsers is a very reasonable judgement from Google. No more Chrome, no more Safari, no more Edge, linux would probably have to be banned entirely because you know, everyone will find a way to install a browser and visit that Hebrew website to watch TV programs in Hebrew, all... what is it, 9 million users of the language? I'm sure it will be just a slight inconvenience for the 5 billion/rest of us.
We do have to be reasonable at times.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> Google is already forced to judge the case. If someone fills enough bogus cases (bogus in Googles opinion) or a ridiculous one they (google) can stop processing them Google can already do that if it judges that the risk that the complsinant has a legitimate case is low enough that they don't need a safe harbor against them. The only consequence for not honoring a takedown is that if you would have been liable to the company's for copyright infringement before considering the DMCA safe harbor, you don't eliminate that liability.