This is more or less exhibit A in why it often is so difficult to have objective discussions around contented subjects: The argument is not about the person, th

This is more or less exhibit A in why it often is so difficult to have objective discussions around contented subjects: The argument is not about the person, the argument is hardly ever about the person. It is about the message the person brings, in this case Lindsay's message on the origins of "critical social justice" or "DEI". Stop looking at the messenger and start concentrating on the message. In this case my question was centred around the absence of anything to support your statements around the origins of "DEI" while Lindsay's statements check out due to the lengthy trail all the way back to the 1800's. Do you have anything to support your statements, anything free from circular references where A says B as supported by C where C says B because A says so? Where does DEI come from according to you?