3 ms·
> The program shouldn't be trusted unless you wrote it yourself, or otherwise performed a security audit yourself. I'm just a humble non-crytographic-programme
by tomxor 3y ago
> The program shouldn't be trusted unless you wrote it yourself, or otherwise performed a security audit yourself.
I'm just a humble non-crytographic-programmer making practical suggestions with the most substantial security improvement for the least effort... Of course personally - I roll dice, dice that I whittled out of sticks, sticks from different trees that I collected from different parks, parks that I visited in a random order based on the results of a PRNG of my own secret design, a PRNG I built out of swarm crab based logic gates on a secret beach, seeded with a number collected from a geiger counter and small sample of u238, a geiger counter I constructed from photodiodes and aluminium foil, photodiodes I fabricated out of mud, rocks and fire. One day I hope to finish implementing my own general purpose computer and browser, then I will finally be able to use my passwords :)
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- dragontamer 3y agoWell, there's questions like why use 6^5 (46656) words if you're just not going to be rolling six-sided dice? There are other wordlists and dictionaries out there. For example, randomly selecting words from the Basic English Wordlist (https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Basic_English_combined_wordlist#cite_note-1 https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Basic_English_co...), a list of 2626 words, could be a better methodology.