33 ms·
If the problem is distribution, what's wrong with gzip? All the upsize of UPX and none of the downsides. If your distribution method is http, then you don't eve
by nemothekid 3y ago
If the problem is distribution, what's wrong with gzip? All the upsize of UPX and none of the downsides. If your distribution method is http, then you don't even have to write any code other than setting a Content-Encoding header.
- latchkey 3y agogzip doesn't make it small enough. 3mb is after `xz -z -9e`. But, if you start with something smaller, you generally get something even smaller. I tried UPX, but ended up with just `-s -w` (and xz), simply because UPX was taking too long to build the binary in CI. More importantly though, I was responding to OP's absolute.