3 ms·

>requires outrageous hardware Who is going to pay $20/mo other than professionals? You'd assume professionals have professional hardware. A mid-range GPU or a

>requires outrageous hardware Who is going to pay $20/mo other than professionals? You'd assume professionals have professional hardware. A mid-range GPU or a video editing laptop is not exactly breaking the bank. >no tool required to see that it is generated But again, that also applies to commercial generative images. They're easily discernible, if you just look. Midjourney is stable diffusion with a bunch of LoRA stacked on top. And it can't shed the "midjourney look" because of that. That's not in dispute by anyone.

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
throwaway290 3y ago
> They're easily discernible, if you just look. 100%, although dall-e is getting better with hands specifically. Anyway, Microsoft can keep throwing compute on it until a point where it becomes impossible to distinguish fakes by sight and a mechanism like suggested will make sense. But with homegrown ones I don't see it happening soon. Only those who spend a lot of money on top of the line GPUs and keep desktop PCs may get to that point. Those GPUs will jump in price like they did at crypto mining peak or become impossible to buy if Microsoft gets the government to require "AI license" for them. > Who is going to pay $20/mo other than professionals Apple Music costs $10 and people easily spend ten times that on Patreon...