3 ms·
Theoretically isn't this was the head of state should do in many country's setups? They are the ultimate arbiter of power, and have the power to nominate prime
by zpeti 3y ago
Theoretically isn't this was the head of state should do in many country's setups? They are the ultimate arbiter of power, and have the power to nominate prime ministers, but don't have real legislative power themselves.
- xeromal 3y agoTheoretically. I do believe that a country run by a benevolent king or dictator is probably the most effectively run. That role is just mired for 10 bad ones for every good one.
- BeFlatXIII 3y agoThey also have the sword over their head that should they ever use that power, they will be listened to and promptly have their office abolished after. [Or at least that's how I understand the modern British monarchy]