> Something that lets us all communicate isn't inherently bad. I’m not so sure this is the case. Seems like we are testing the limits of our social programming

> Something that lets us all communicate isn't inherently bad. I’m not so sure this is the case. Seems like we are testing the limits of our social programming when exposed to networks _vastly_ beyond our capabilities historically, and we’re seeing the various ways that our social behaviors break down naturally. That there is a profit motive in encouraging and accelerating this breakdown might be orthogonal to the idea that it isn’t meant to exist at this scale in the first place.