> The US Department of Commerce said it strongly opposed the action, which it said had “no basis in fact.” Political rhetoric. From my memory and quick search,

> The US Department of Commerce said it strongly opposed the action, which it said had “no basis in fact.” Political rhetoric. From my memory and quick search, the Huawei ban also had "no basis in fact." It was conducted with very little to no facts given publicly (unless I missed a major media outlet explanation) yet led to $2 billion in taxpayer cost [0]. Of course this doesn't mean Huawei doesn't have the capability or susceptibility to compromise a nation's security... but my point is, the same holds true for Micron. [0] https://www.fcc.gov/supplychain/reimbursement https://www.fcc.gov/supplychain/reimbursement