3 ms·
I agree. It's interesting because nearly all the GIF searches I use on a regular basis are terrible, yet I wouldn't be too perturbed if I were given relevant/fu
by petercooper 3y ago
I agree. It's interesting because nearly all the GIF searches I use on a regular basis are terrible, yet I wouldn't be too perturbed if I were given relevant/funny/interesting GIFs that contained product placement (say, a GIF for "cheers!" might be someone raising a glass of Coke).
I think the problem might be that advertisers can't control context. Someone might say something vile (but legal) on Twitter and get lots of meme GIFs in the replies that advertisers would be very unhappy about, and it's a more direct connection than having your sponsored tweet appear in the chain.
- londons_explore 3y agoA gif sharing service could provide code to the big embedders (ie. twitter, facebook, whatsapp) which scans for bad words and phrases and decides if a particular gif is to be suggested for posting in that particular conversation. If the conversation isn't advertiser suitable, the user just gets to choose from mundane non-branded gifs. That should be enough to satisfy most brand advertisers.