3 ms·
Just require a license for matmul in parallel, obviously. Only responsible, safe companies will be able to get the licenses. Then we don't have to define those
by srslack 3y ago
Just require a license for matmul in parallel, obviously. Only responsible, safe companies will be able to get the licenses. Then we don't have to define those pesky terms like "intelligence" or "autonomy" or explain how the rogue AI will manipulate everyone with mind viruses or self replicate itself to the botnet. Roguenet?
It's the only way to save democracy.
You know, come to think of it, it's funny how the Russian disinformation is now AI disinformation, instead of human disinformation. As we know, Photoshopping single photos of smoke rising into the sky is notoriously labor intensive, requiring teams, if not the entirety of state-level sanctioned organizational output, of human beings. The game has changed, and democracy is at stake.
- andyjohnson0 3y ago> Just require a license for matmul in parallel, obviously Alternatively, all ML training data could simply be required to include an "evil flag" to indicate whether it is being used for evil purposes. And ML algorithms could simply be required to refuse to run if the evil bit^W flag is set. Problem solved.
- chrisco255 3y agoYou know, democracy pre-dates photographic and video production altogether, and previously, all that was needed to create a false story was a block of text sent over a telegraph or a handwritten note.