3 ms·
First and foremost: Aesthetics are subjective. You cannot plausibly tell me that the Twitter dialog has bad usability because you don’t like its aesthetics, at
by ugh 15y ago
First and foremost: Aesthetics are subjective.
You cannot plausibly tell me that the Twitter dialog has bad usability because you don’t like its aesthetics, at least not without extensive usability testing.
You might not like the aesthetics, others might. (I hate most of Apple’s skinning attempts but the Tweet dialog is actually one of the few exceptions to that. I think it’s aesthetically very pleasing and I like it very much.)
- overcyn 15y agoAnd because its subjective its not important? Because its subjective you cannot criticize it? A good product is not made from cut and dry rules and usability testing. Taste is involved.
- ugh 15y agoSure – but it’s much harder to make that argument. I do think that the Tweet dialog is awesome and fits perfectly. I also cannot see how the paperclip negatively influences usability. I just cannot. It seems extremely implausible to me. When it comes to the Tweet dialog, Apple exhibited exemplar taste. It’s well done and none of the metaphors are wonky or introduce strange behavior. That is my opinion.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]