4 ms·
Where was the part where they created controversy? They stated that several of their users noticed the similarity. Article just states that it could create conf
by djbender 15y ago
Where was the part where they created controversy? They stated that several of their users noticed the similarity. Article just states that it could create confusion for users, nothing more.
Do I think they copied us? Probably not (but as a designer, I’ll take the compliment).
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- ThomPete 15y agoThat's the controversy. I can just see how lesser knowledgeable journalist will get this wrong.
- dangrossman 15y agoIt's not a press release, it's a blog post, on the company's blog, about why that company is changing its logo. It's not written for journalists in the first place.
- kmfrk 15y ago"I am not saying the man is beating his wife, but (...)" is to perpetuate the idea instead of just plainly saying "I don't think they copied us". It reads like something out of an antagonistic lawyer from a procedural TV show. We need a Spock take on this. My comment was a response to the original title of the submission, which read something along the lines of "HipChat comment on Apple logo plagiarism rumours" or something to that effect more so than the post itself.