> They found that for attendees who had multiple schedule conflicts with a liked talk, the probability of later citing that talk was 2.6%. But for attendees who

> They found that for attendees who had multiple schedule conflicts with a liked talk, the probability of later citing that talk was 2.6%. But for attendees who did not have a conflict, that figure rose to 3.8%. Doesn’t seem super scientific, schedules and conflicts vary so much between people, personal events, exams, tragedy’s… pretty hard to lump these all together. This could just be a matter of, the people who went, wanted to go more, therefore they’re more interested and more likely to cite the work in the future