> in what way ? For example, this router has a GPS antenna. https://wiki.teltonika-networks.com/view/RUTX11_GPS https://wiki.teltonika-networks.com/view/RUTX11

> in what way ? For example, this router has a GPS antenna. https://wiki.teltonika-networks.com/view/RUTX11_GPS https://wiki.teltonika-networks.com/view/RUTX11_GPS Which of course means it can forward the NMEA data to a TCP server, and also cache it, and also log it to a file, and you can configure this all per-sentence type, and you can enable an HTTPS server to provide it, and it supports multiple AVL protocols for vehicle location tracking, and it has a rules engine, and a geofencing system, and it can trigger GPIO pin signals. I'm pretty sure it has an RTCM client as well but I can't find it mentioned on the wiki right now. All of which is awesome if you want to use it as an integration point within a larger system, like I want to, assuming that those features actually work. I do not know either way. These routers tend to be implemented with A proprietary GUI and a few proprietary daemons on top of OpenWRT and a bunch of bundled open source daemons. The Teltonica appears to be the same. This can work well but it gives me the heebie jeebies. > How's CLI? It's an OpenWRT shell, basically. Presumably they have commands to interact with whatever configuration system the GUI is using but I haven't checked.