Thanks for mentioning others. The main thing I love about OP's library is the simple, clear naming. A lot of complexity has been solved for me. Looking at ra

Thanks for mentioning others. The main thing I love about OP's library is the simple, clear naming. A lot of complexity has been solved for me. Looking at random-js, the barrier to entry is higher. I've looked at randomness libraries and that's the feeling they gave me: That I would need to learn how randomness works, rather than just calling a function for what I want; a random int, a weighted random. Cmd+F "weighted" doesn't find anything on both of those projects' readmes. There's a tradeoff for simplicity, but in many cases I'll take it. This is the iPhone of randomness and that's what I needed to feel comfortable using it rather than rolling my own.